Steven Aliano Nov 23, AM. Architecture vs. Design Many Operational Technology OT projects start with identifying the requirements and then diving straigh Achal Lekhi Nov 16, AM. Brian Peterson Nov 9, AM. We're on social media. Keep in touch! Simon's analysis of Nathan's parable in 2 Sam According to Simon, the juridical parable constitutes a realistic story about a violation of the law, related to someone who had committed a similar offense with the purpose of leading the unsuspecting hearer to pass judgment on himself.
The offender will be caught in the trap set for him if he truly believes that the story told him actually happened, and only if he does not detect prematurely the similarity between the offence in the story and the one he himself has committed.
Agreeing with Long that the juridical parable does not adequately describe the form of Jer 3:l-5, n I therefore eliminate it from my discussion. The common element in the four remaining texts is the legal issue in which the decoy is concealed.
In the historical books the case is presented to the king, while in Isaiah the case is delivered to the inhabitants of Jerusalem and men of Judah. Each text to some extent follows a standard rhetorical pattern which I would now like to examine, adding to Simon's study of such parables. The Nathan parable of 2 Sam follows the story of David's indiscretion with Bathsheba and his subsequent order to Joab to place Uriah at the battlefront.
The narrative begins with Yhwh sending the prophet, Nathan, to David. I outline the rhetorical structure, which will be a paradigm for the three other parables, as follows: A. Parable—2 Sam lb Nathan presents to David for a legal decision the "case" concerning the robbery of the poor man's ewe-lamb by the rich man.
Judgment—2 Sam David responds angrily to the case and utters an oath, pronouncing a judgment of death upon the rich man and sentenc- ing him to a fourfold retribution for the ewe-lamb. Interpretation—2 Sam a: Nathan, after David thus condemns himself by his judgment, announces, "You are the man. Recital of the benevolent actions of God—2 Sam b Yhwh himself recapitulates his generosity towards David in the first person. Note the dramatic conclusion of the oracle marked by the particle hi, where David's past deeds are juxtaposed with Yhwh's future deeds which result from them.
The juridical parable in 2 Sam follows a similar pattern. The agent, however, is not a prophet but a "wise w o m a n , " disguised as a mourning widow. She was sent to David by J o a b , who sensed that David was longing for his exiled son, Absalom. Parable—2 Sam The woman presents her case to the king: she is a widow with two sons, one killing the other in a quarrel.
The whole clan seeks vengeance for the murdered son in the life of his brother: "Thus they would quench my coal which is left and leave to my husband neither name nor remnant upon the face of the earth" v. Judgment—2 Sam The woman manipulates the king to pronounce an oath and pass the judgment that her son will not be destroyed.
Interpretation—2 Sam b The interpretation of the woman's parable begins with the particle hi: "for in giving this decision the king convicts himself, inasmuch as he does not bring his banished one home again. The juridical parable of the woman at Tekoa departs from the Nathan form in the absence of D— The recital of the benevolent actions of God. This is also true of the juridical parable found in 1 Kgs In this episode the spokesman is another prophet whose mode of concealment is a bandage over his wounds.
King Ahab has just covenanted himself with the enemy, Ben-Hadad. Parable—1 Kgs a: The disguised prophet presents his "case" to the king: A soldier had entrusted a prisoner of war to him, threatening that should this man escape, "your life shall be for his life, or else you pay a talent of silver.
Judgment—1 Kgs b: The king declares: "Soshallyourjudgmentbe;you yourself have decided it," thus condemning himself. Indictment and F'. Sentence—1 Kgs The prophet removes his disguise and is recognized by the king as one of the spokes- men of God. The interpretation of the parable is found in the statement which both indicts and sentences the king: "Because you have let go out of your hand the man whom I had devoted to destruction, therefore your life shall go for his life and your people for his people.
Before an examination of Isa I would like to summarize the results thus far on the OT juridical parable. They all contain an indictment and sentence. Moreover, the Nathan parable shares the recapitulation of God's acts found in Deut In two of the three juridical parables prophets are sent to the kings; in the third, a gifted woman.
In each example the real situation of the king is masked in the parable. After the parable is related, an oath is pronounced by the king in two instances before he gives the judgment on the "case.
Only the Nathan parable has a short application of the parable to David and a recital of God's benevolence immediately following the king's judgment.
All three instances contain an indictment. Moreover, the interpretation of the parables is found in all three cases. In the woman's parable the interpretation follows the indictment with the particle ki. In the 1 Kings parable the interpretation is implied in the indictment itself.
Finally, all the cases contain a sentencing of the royal offender. In both the Nathan parable and the 1 Kings parable, the sentence is announced in the divine first person.
This is not the case for the woman's parable because of her sensitive role as both defendant in the case and accuser of the king. We can now assess the Isaian parable in light of the other juridical parables discussed. Isa follows the form of the juridical parable but with a significant modification: A. Parable—Isa 5:lb Within the framework of a "song" Isaiah presents the "case" about his friend and the unproductiveness of the choice vines which he planted in his vineyard.
Judgment—Isa After the "case" is laid out, the speaker changes to the vineyard-owner himself who requests the inhabitants of Jerusalem and men of Judah to judge the proceedings accordingly. Recital of benevolent actions of God—Isa a: There is no immediate inter- pretation of the parable or indictment following the judgment as in the other OT parables.
However, like the Nathan parable and the song of Deuteronomy 32, the vineyard-owner in the first person recounts his positive activity for the vineyard in a rhetorical question. Whatever the choice of a reference standard is a decision that will condition the plant documentation for a long period of time, this implies that the change of standard or reference will be complex or practically impossible. We have prepared this complete pdf so that you have all the information we give in this article and you can share it, discuss it with your colleagues and use it professionally.
We consider that it is better to have a well-formatted text that includes all the key concepts explained in this publication ready to share or save for later use. You can share this article through:. Some of these standards, such as the ISA , are more than 20 years old and have been considered, in the absence of other documents, as de facto standards in the international industry.
As a general rule, the standards mentioned in this article are used as reference documentation in the process of creating process plant standards. Identification labels are a combination of letters and numbers used to uniquely recognize a process item. This standard lets a person with a basic knowledge about process control to understand what measurements are available in the installation and understand how control over the process works by interpreting the documents and drawings of the process.
One important function this standard performs is to provide a standard list of line symbols to be used in the documentation process. This standard describes the instrumentation symbols and their identification systems. This drawing standard introduces a consistent mechanism that comprises identification schemes and graphic symbols in order to describe and identify instruments and process items and their functions.
The ISA standard is widely applied in commercial process software, which is used for measuring, monitoring and controlling actual process production ISA, The purpose of this drawing standard is to establish a system of graphic symbols for displays that are used by plant operators process measurement and control.
The system is intended to promote :. Resulting benefits are intended to be. The drawing standard is suitable for use in the chemical, petroleum, power generation, air conditioning, metal refining, and numerous other industries.
The purpose of this standard is to establish documentation for that class of instrumentation consisting of computers, programmable controllers, minicomputers and microprocessor-based systems that have shared control, shared display or other interface features. Symbols are provided for interfacing field instrumentation, control room instrumentation and other hardware to the above.
Terminology is defined in the broadest generic form to describe the various categories of these devices. It is not the intent of this standard to mandate the use of each type symbol for each occurrence of a generic device within the overall control system.
If, for example, a computer component is an integral part of a distributed control system, the use of the computer symbol would normally be an undesirable redundancy.
0コメント